Photo by Innerbody Research
In the United States, roughly 60% of adults over the age of 20 take dietary supplements to fill in nutrition gaps or achieve certain health goals,1 while only about 10% are meeting their daily fruit and vegetable intakes.2 These may seem like wholly unrelated statistics, but there’s a question to consider — would you be more likely to take in adequate fruits and vegetables if you could easily supplement them instead? If your answer is yes, then “greens powders” may be something to consider. (We used quotation marks there because, as you’ll see, these products provide much more than powdered greens.)
As the market for these products has expanded over time, it’s become increasingly difficult to know which one is the best for your unique needs.3 In this review, we’re pitting two popular contenders against each other: Primal Greens and AG1.
Throughout this head-to-head comparison, we’ll explain the pros, cons, and details that drove our decisions in each category. But if you’re short on time, here’s our 2024 verdict: we believe that AG1 is the better overall pick for most people at this time. Check out our summary table and read this entire extensive comparison to learn about all of the factors that led to our conclusion.
Not only does AG1 earn our recommendation when pitted against Primal Greens, but it also happens to be our top pick among all greens powders right now.
Athletic Greens' AG1 costs more but is the better value. It’s a supplement powder that’s NSF-Certified for Sport and contains 75 ingredients per serving, including (but not limited to) a raw superfood complex, antioxidants, digestive enzymes, functional mushrooms, 7.2 billion CFU of dairy-free probiotics, and 21 vitamins and minerals (ten of which provide 100% or more of your recommended Daily Value). While AG1 is available on Amazon, subscriptions — and their discounts — aren't offered, and returns aren't accepted for food safety reasons. For subscription savings of around 20% and the protection of a 90-day money-back guarantee, we recommend buying directly from the AG1 website.
Before we delve into further details, the chart below offers a quick overview of which greens powder won in each category.
Primal Greens | AG1 | |
---|---|---|
Cost | Winner | |
Convenience | Winner | |
Gut health | Winner | |
For sensitive stomachs | Winner | |
Reduce chronic disease risk | Draw | Draw |
Boost immunity | Winner | |
More energy | Draw | Draw |
For athletes | Winner | |
Vitamin and mineral content | Winner | |
Taste | Winner | |
Allergy-friendliness | Winner |
Over the past two decades, Innerbody Research has helped tens of millions of readers make more informed decisions involving staying healthy and living healthier lifestyles.
For this comparison of Primal Greens and AG1, our team spent 90+ hours reading through over 80 different studies on greens powders, common ingredients, and their potential benefits and drawbacks. We also explored every inch of the customer experience, tested out subscriptions, purchased these products ourselves, and gave them each a fair try.
Additionally, like all health-related content on this website, this review was thoroughly vetted by one or more members of our Medical Review Board for accuracy.
For this comparison of Primal Greens and AG1, we judged each greens powder using criteria that we felt were most important to consumers — their safety, efficacy, cost, convenience, and taste. Here’s a quick summary of what each criterion covers:
Winner: AG1
Primal Harvest and Athletic Greens, the companies behind Primal Greens and AG1, respectively, both take noteworthy steps to ensure the safety of their customers.
It’s worth noting that the FDA doesn’t regulate supplements the same way it does prescription medication.4 However, other countries handle things differently than the U.S. In New Zealand, where AG1 is made, it falls under the jurisdiction of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). This agency does, in fact, regulate “complementary medicines,” including nutritional supplements and vitamins.5
AG1 is also NSF Certified for Sport,6 meaning it’s been tested for contaminants, banned substances, and to ensure that what’s on the label is actually what’s in the product.7 All NSF Certified for Sport products must also be manufactured in GMP-certified facilities that are audited yearly or every other year.7 Primal Greens, despite not having this NSF certification, is also manufactured in a GMP-certified facility and the product undergoes third-party safety testing.
Ingredient-wise, AG1 does contain soy, while Primal Greens has no allergens in its ingredients (though it is produced on shared machinery). And some botanical ingredients, like ashwagandha (in both), may interact with certain medications or health concerns.8
That being said, with TGA oversight, NSF certification, and thorough third-party testing for more than just contaminants, AG1 still stands apart from most other greens powders — including Primal Greens — and earns our choice for safety.
Winner: AG1
The efficacy of a greens powder is directly related to its nutritional value, and AG1 beats Primal Greens by a mile in this sense. While Primal Greens contains five vitamins and minerals — with only two over 100% of your Daily Value — AG1 offers 21, and ten of those cover 100% or more of your Daily Value. AG1 also has generally larger doses of its blends and more probiotic content per serving.
Insider Tip: The Primal Greens bag notes it can be mixed into hot beverages, cooked, etc., but this will kill the live probiotics and render the digestive enzymes ineffective.9 10 Because of this, we do not recommend mixing greens powders, like Primal Greens, into hot liquids or cooking/baking with them if you wish to maintain their nutritional content.
In addition, multiple (self-funded) studies have been done on AG1's potential for supporting gut health. The results found higher levels of healthy gut bacteria, better digestion, and more appetite control. Of course, self-funded studies introduce the potential for bias, but studies on specific products may never exist without the company funding them. Athletic Greens notes the involvement of third parties in these studies to try and reduce bias, at least. Primal Greens, on the other hand, has had no studies done on it at the time of this writing.
To give Primal Greens some credit, both it and AG1 have similar potential for improving energy and reducing the risk of chronic health conditions. Eating more fruits and vegetables to try and reach the recommended five servings a day may lower your chances of developing chronic diseases,11 and the complex carbs in these greens powders can give you lasting energy.12 13
Winner: Primal Greens
As we’ll explain in more detail later on in this review, Primal Greens costs about half of what you’d spend on AG1; this is a consistent fact whether you’re looking at subscriptions or one-time purchases. Greens powders, in general, are pricier than typical supplements, but subscription discounts, bulk purchase deals, and money-back guarantees can help ease the financial burden of trying them out.
The chart below details how the prices break down for a 30-day supply from each brand. (It’s worth noting that Primal Greens is only available as one product, a pouch of powder, while AG1 is available as a pouch or in travel packets, hence the price ranges.)
Primal Greens | AG1 | |
---|---|---|
One-time purchase | $49.95 | $99-$109 |
One-time purchase cost per serving | $1.67 | $3.30-$3.63 |
Subscription | $39.96 (20% off) | $79-$89 (18-20% off) |
Subscription cost per serving | $1.33 | $2.63-$2.96 |
Bulk purchase discount? | Yes, but only for one-time purchases (6-18% off) | No |
In the case of Primal Greens, subscription and bulk purchase discounts allow you to save some money on both recurring and one-time purchases. In contrast, you can only save on AG1 with a subscription. Of course, to get those bulk purchase discounts from Primal Greens, you need to buy at least two pouches — meaning you’ll be spending more upfront. But, we still appreciate seeing any discount at all for one-time purchases.
Additionally, both products are covered under a 90-day money-back guarantee, which could make a larger upfront investment (for either Primal Greens or AG1) feel less intimidating.
Winner: AG1
Both Primal Greens and AG1 are fairly convenient products. They both have easy-to-navigate websites that make purchasing simple, subscription options that can be managed or canceled at any time, 90-day guarantees, and multiple ways to contact customer service representatives.
AG1 managed to squeak past Primal Greens due to a couple of small differences:
As we explain later on in this review, while these reasons do make AG1 a bit more convenient, none of this is likely enough to prevent someone from wanting to use Primal Greens. In the end, they’re both convenient, but AG1 has a slight edge.
Winner: Primal Greens
Primal Greens and AG1 both have mildly fruity flavors and are sweetened by stevia. However, only one of them manages to properly mask the “green” taste that these types of products are known for — Primal Greens.
AG1 seemingly tries to mask the green taste with a lot of stevia, which is very noticeable and leaves a distinct aftertaste. The fruit that you do taste — mainly pineapple and apple — is quite nice when you manage to push past the stevia. Primal Greens, on the other hand, tried to work with the green flavor by adding complementary fruits that cover most of the bitterness. It’s harder to pinpoint exactly what fruit Primal Greens tastes like, however, but it’s definitely better than AG1.
Photo by Innerbody Research
Primal Greens, from the company Primal Harvest, and AG1, from Athletic Greens, are both supplemental products known as “greens powders” or “powdered greens.”14 Both terms mean the same thing; if you come across a product referring to itself as a “powdered greens supplement,” it’s a greens powder and vice versa. However, the term “greens powder” is the more commonly used one, so that’s what we’ll be referring to them as from here on out.
Photo by Innerbody Research
As for what greens powders are, Julia Zumpano, RD, LD, a registered dietitian with Cleveland Clinic, defines them as “a variety of different fruits and vegetables that have been freeze-dried and ground down to a very fine powdered form that can be mixed pretty easily into a beverage or food.”14
Insider Tip: Athletic Greens calls AG1 “a daily Foundational Nutrition supplement,” but the product still accurately fits the definition of a greens powder.
Primal Greens and AG1 both contain a collection of blends and complexes with various fruits, vegetables, herbs, botanicals, extracts, mushrooms, and more. They also each have a selection of vitamins and minerals to support your daily requirements — or, in some cases, meet them entirely. These products are plant-based, low-carb, and low-calorie, making them suitable for a wide range of diets, needs, and preferences (which we’ll cover in the next section of this review).
Overall winner: AG1
Because the FDA doesn’t have the authority to approve supplements in the same way it does medication, manufacturers need to take extra steps to ensure consumers' safety.4 However, Athletic Greens’ AG1 isn’t an American product; it’s made in New Zealand and, therefore, falls under the jurisdiction of the country’s FDA equivalent, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). In contrast to the FDA, the TGA does regulate “complementary medicines,” including vitamins, nutritional supplements, and herbal and traditional medicines.5 This means that AG1 is likely held to higher initial safety standards than Primal Greens, which is made in the U.S.
All of this isn’t to say that Primal Greens is unsafe, though. The company behind it, Primal Harvest, also takes commendable steps to protect customers. Here’s a quick comparison of the precautionary measures taken for each product.
Primal Greens | AG1 | |
---|---|---|
Third-party safety testing | ||
Made in facilities registered with regulatory agency | ||
Facilities are GMP-certified | ||
NSF Certified for Sport |
As you can see, both greens powders undergo third-party testing and are produced in Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) certified locations.15 However, only AG1 is Certified for Sport by NSF International (more on that later) and made in a facility that’s registered with its applicable regulatory agency — in this case, a TGA-registered one.6
Winner: Primal Greens (barely)
Pivoting to the products themselves, both greens powders should be generally safe for most healthy adults. Children, pregnant or breastfeeding individuals, and those with certain health conditions — such as autoimmune concerns,16 including dermatological ones,17 or chronic kidney disease — should get the okay from a doctor first or avoid greens powders, as several common ingredients may be unsuitable or lead to complications.18
Additionally, some botanical ingredients, like ashwagandha (in both products),8 Rhodiola (in AG1),19 and turmeric (in Primal Greens), may cause miscarriages, exacerbate certain health conditions, and interact with prescription medications.20
And when it comes to food allergies — including gluten, eggs, wheat, dairy, and other common culprits — the only major issue stems from AG1’s soy-derived content. Primal Greens doesn’t contain any common allergens, but it is manufactured in a facility that processes tree nuts, peanuts, wheat, and soy. AG1 doesn’t mention other allergens in its facilities, but we’d still suggest proceeding with caution. Ultimately, if you have any food allergies that may be triggered through cross-contact, we recommend speaking with your doctor or allergist first to make sure these greens powders are safe for you.21 (And it’s best to avoid AG1 entirely if you’re allergic to soy.)
Insider Tip: On the topic of ingredient safety, we also recommend speaking with your doctor before mixing a greens powder with any type of additional vitamin or mineral supplement (such as a multivitamin). While adequate amounts of vitamins and minerals are necessary for good health, too much can lead to serious — sometimes fatal — concerns like multiple vitamin overdose or hypervitaminosis.22 23 This is also why children should not take whole servings of green powders intended for adults; only a doctor can determine the proper amount.
Winner: AG1 (barely)
If you’re wondering whether or not these products are suitable for keto, paleo, vegetarian, or vegan diets, here’s how Primal Greens and AG1 stack up:
Both are suitable; each has only around 6g of carbohydrates per serving, with about 2g of that being dietary fiber and no added sugars.
Neither is suitable for a Paleo diet, as both contain legumes. Primal Greens has alfalfa, and while AG1 claims to be paleo-friendly, it contains protein from peas, which are also legumes.
Both are vegetarian, but only AG1 outright states its vegan-friendly status. The Primal Greens product page notes that it’s “made to suit many different dietary needs and lifestyles” and that it contains “no eggs, gluten, soy, dairy, or gelatin” but there’s no further, specific detail about which diets.
The suitability of both depends. As with vegan and paleo diets, AG1 claims to be okay for intermittent fasting. We’re not entirely sure what type of intermittent fasting or when in the fasting cycle the company means, though, since you can eat pretty much anything when not fasting.24 But, during the fasting period, many sources indicate that any calories break a fast and that only zero-calorie beverages like water and black coffee are allowed.25
If AG1 means during eating hours, then both it and Primal Greens would be suitable. During fasting, both may only be suitable in Modified Alternate Day Fasting (MADF) where some eating still occurs during fasting periods.24
Winner: AG1
As we mentioned earlier, AG1 is NSF Certified for Sport, while Primal Greens is not.6 The NSF Certified for Sport program is recognized and recommended by several major sports organizations, including (but not limited to) the National Hockey League, Canadian Football League, and Major League Baseball.
As stated on the official website, Certified for Sport means that all supplements, functional foods, cosmetics, and personal care makers and suppliers “meet stringent certification guidelines” developed by groups including sports industry professionals.26
Those guidelines include verifying that certified products:7
Primal Greens, in comparison, does undergo safety testing for contaminants and is produced in a GMP-certified facility. However, Athletic Greens' extra safety measures for AG1 go above and beyond the basics, which we appreciate.
Winner: AG1
Generally, most of the potential health improvements you may see from taking a greens powder can be attributed to the fact that you’re consuming more fruits and vegetables. This is also why people who already eat a diverse array of fruits and vegetables in recommended amounts (a combined total of five servings, daily) aren’t likely to see much, if any, additional benefit from taking a greens powder.14 27
For example, a 2021 meta-analysis found that — compared to those who ate only two servings — people who ate five servings of fruits and vegetables daily had a lower risk of death from all causes, including cancer, heart disease, stroke, and respiratory diseases. However, eating more than five servings didn’t improve the statistics.11 So, it stands to reason that the same would apply to adding on a greens powder if you already regularly eat your recommended amount of fruit and veggies.
Now, if you find yourself struggling to meet your recommended daily intake — like around 90% of adults in the U.S. — then a greens powder could be a quick and easy way to fill in the gap.2 And if you’re looking to do just that, then you more than likely want the greens powder with the most fruit and vegetable content. Between Primal Greens and AG1, the latter has more nutrients by far.
Greens powders typically contain a selection of different blends of fruits, vegetables, and other ingredients — and Primal Greens and AG1 are no different. Thankfully, they have fairly similar blends and nutrient complexes, which lets us compare them a bit more easily. The chart below breaks down the size of these blends, along with some vitamin and mineral details, including how many of those vitamins and minerals are in quantities large enough to meet your Percent Daily Value (%DV).
Note: Primal Greens’ superfood blend also contains its antioxidant and mushroom ingredients, which AG1 has in separate blends and complexes. So, Primal Greens’ “superfood” content in the chart isn’t only superfoods, while AG1’s is. And, in contrast, AG1 puts its digestive ingredients with its mushrooms, while Primal Greens’ digestive complex is by itself. We’ll go into more detail on these different blends in a bit.
Primal Greens | AG1 | |
---|---|---|
Superfoods | 4.9g | 7.39g |
Nutrient-dense extracts | 2.2g | 2.73g |
Digestive ingredients | 674mg | 154mg |
Probiotic content | 22.5mg (3.5B CFU) | 54mg (7.2B CFU) |
Number of vitamins | 3 | 11 |
Number of minerals | 2 | 10 |
Vitamins and minerals with 100% or more DV | 2 | 10 |
As you can see, AG1 provides far more vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients than Primal Greens — all of which give the former a stronger foundation for providing potential health benefits.
Before discussing the research behind some of the most prominent ingredients in Primal Greens and AG1, let’s review their basic supplement facts and the Percent Daily Value (%DV) of the vitamins and minerals.
Photo by Innerbody Research
Per serving, Primal Greens contains:
Photo by Innerbody Research
In comparison, each serving of AG1 contains:
Now, as mentioned earlier, greens powders are often made up of various proprietary blends; this means you may know what the ingredients are, but not the amount of each individual ingredient. From our experience with greens powders, they’ll usually list individual vitamin and mineral content along with the total amount of each proprietary blend or complex — and, as you can see, that’s exactly how the Supplement Facts for Primal Greens and AG1 are presented.
With proprietary blends, it’s important to know that there are rules for how a Supplement Facts panel needs to be formatted in the U.S. The FDA explains that, for proprietary blends, “Indented underneath the name of the blend, you must list the ‘other dietary ingredients’ in the blend, either in a column or linear fashion, in descending order of predominance by weight.”28
Considering that information, we’ve put together a chart with some scientific research on the first two ingredients in each product’s blends.
The first two ingredients in Primal Greens’ Superfood, Antioxidant, and Mushroom Blend are alfalfa leaf and carrot. According to a 2010 review, alfalfa leaf may offer neuroprotective, antioxidant, hypocholesterolemic, and digestive benefits, among others. It could also be a beneficial supplement for those with diabetes, heart disease, and menopause symptoms.29 However, it’s worth mentioning that another study explains that alfalfa also contains an anti-nutrient called saponins, which may be able to inhibit “activities of digestive enzymes” and lead to indigestion or other related GI concerns.30
Perhaps the most well-known benefit of carrots is their effect on eye health, which is true due to their bioavailable beta-carotene and lutein content.31 Additionally, carrots contain some fiber, and, while there’s not a huge amount of it in Primal Greens, adding more fiber to your diet may promote better digestive health,32 lower cancer risk,33 level out blood sugar,34 and reduce your risk of cardiovascular disease.35 Of course, the 2.4g of fiber in a serving of Primal Greens likely isn’t enough to do all of that on its own, especially when some successful studies use up to 9.5g, but it can help boost a healthy dietary intake.32
AG1’s Alkaline, Nutrient-Dense Raw Superfood Complex has organic spirulina and lecithin as its first two inclusions. Spirulina is a blue-green algae that’s rich in vitamins, minerals, protein, carotenoids, and antioxidants.36 37 This algae also contains, as researchers describe it, “a pigment-protein” called C-phycocyanin, which may be able to lower cholesterol, inflammation, and oxidative stress.38 Similar to mushrooms, blue-green algae can be susceptible to absorbing toxins in their environment, which is why it’s important for companies to conduct thorough safety testing, which AG1 does.36
Lecithin is the sole ingredient that makes AG1 unsuitable for those with soy allergies. Athletic Greens notes its inclusion is for phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylinositol content. Phosphatidylcholine is mainly produced in the liver, but, as noted by experts, “the amount that the body naturally synthesizes is not sufficient to meet human needs.” It’s essential for your body’s cell membranes, and it may protect your heart, liver, and the structural integrity of your neurons.39 Phosphatidylinositol, the other nutrient from AG1’s lecithin, may increase levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL or “good” cholesterol).40
The first two inclusions in Primal Greens’ Nutrient Dense Natural Herbs and Extracts blend are acacia gum and acerola cherry extract. While acacia gum is most often used in foods, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics as a stabilizing or thickening agent, it also has some potential health benefits.41 It may act as a prebiotic with hypoglycemic, hypolipidemic, antidiabetic, and antiobesity properties.42
The acerola cherry is described as “one of the richest natural sources of ascorbic acid” in one research review, as it contains 50-100 times that of citrus fruits. It’s also rich in phytonutrients, like carotenoids and flavonoids, which give it high levels of immune-boosting antioxidants.43
AG1’s Nutrient Dense Extracts, Herbs, & Antioxidant blend has alkaline pea protein isolate and citrus bioflavonoids extract as its first two ingredients. Pea protein is considered a high-quality protein, and it contains antioxidants, potassium, magnesium, phosphorus, calcium, vitamins, and several essential amino acids. Consuming pea protein regularly may reduce cholesterol and your risk of diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases.44
Similarly, citrus bioflavonoids appear to be beneficial for cardiovascular and metabolic health. They can also scavenge free radicals (reducing oxidative stress and disease risk), improve glucose resistance, lower inflammation, and more.45 46
Apple fiber and inulin come first in Primal Greens’ Digestive Complex. A 2015 review found that apples and their components may reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases by positively impacting the gut microbiome.49 And according to a small 2022 study on ten healthy subjects and nine with impaired glucose tolerance, eating an apple before a meal may be able to improve postprandial hyperglycemia (an abnormally high blood sugar spike after eating). However, this study used 150g of apple, or about 232 times the size of the entire 674mg blend.47 48
Inulin is made by plants as an energy source. Besides feeding plants, this prebiotic can also feed the good bacteria in your gut. Foods high in inulin include artichokes, bananas, garlic, oats, onions, wheat, soybeans, and more.50 It can benefit your gut microbiome, help constipation by stimulating bowel movements, and promote weight loss by keeping you feeling fuller longer.50 51
Astragalus root powder extract and bromelain are the first two ingredients in AG1’s Digestive Enzyme & Super Mushroom Complex. A common herb in traditional Chinese medicine,52 astragalus is a root that has seen more research on its potential for gut health in recent years, though most of it has been on animals.53 In one study on weaned piglets, astragalus appeared to improve their ability to digest amino acids potentially due to “an improvement in the integrity of the small intestine and a beneficial modulation of the microbiome” that improved digestion and absorption of proteins.54 And researchers conducting a separate study on sheep found that supplementing them with astragalus increased their ability to digest fiber and boosted immunoglobulin A (IgA) content in their small intestine mucosa.55
Bromelain’s research has shown mixed results, but this digestive enzyme found in pineapples is particularly good at reducing inflammation from infections and injuries.56 It may also help with muscle soreness, swelling of the sinuses and gums, and digestive concerns.57
For this entry, we’ll examine all three of Primal Greens’ probiotics: Bifidobacterium longum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus. In total, Primal Greens offers 3.5 billion colony-forming units (CFU), which is the number of viable or alive cells per serving.58 B. Longum is one of the most abundant species of bacteria in the human gut from an early age.59 However, it declines over time and may be reduced further by certain health conditions. It appears to protect against inflammatory GI concerns, affect immune responses, and more, so supplementing may prove beneficial.60
L. acidophilus may help treat bacterial vaginosis and prevent diarrhea and gastrointestinal infections. It can also replace the good bacteria killed by antibiotics, improve lactose intolerance, and enhance the immune system, among other things.61 Similarly, L. rhamnosus may inhibit pathogens (like E. coli),62 promote vaginal bacteria balance,63 and maintain a healthy GI microbiome.64
Each serving of AG1 contains 7.2 billion CFU of two specific strains of dairy-free probiotics: Lactobacillus acidophilus - UALa-01 and Bifidobacterium bifidum - UABb-10. These strains are produced by the bioscience company Chr. Hansen, which specializes in bacteria cultures and probiotics for animals, humans, and food products. The company conducts scientific research and clinical trials on its strains, and notes that L. acidophilus UALa-01 and B. bifidum UABb-10 are tested for “safety, quality, and stability.”65
In a mouse study using a mixture of L. acidophilus UALa-01 and other probiotics, subjects experienced beneficial effects on gut microbiota, strengthening of the intestinal barrier, and anti-inflammatory effects.66 Additionally, an unrelated study found this probiotic may help stabilize bone turnover in postmenopausal women.67 Finally, a study on bowel habits using a probiotic containing B. bifidum UABb-10 found it led to “faster normalization of stool frequency and consistency” after one week of treatment.59
Overall winner: AG1
While the previous section goes over the broader health-boosting potential of Primal Greens and AG1 based on nutrient content and prominent ingredients, this section delves into more specifics about certain concerns and how these greens powders may be able to help. Generally, there are about four main benefits greens powders are purported to provide:
We cover each of these potential health benefits — in that order — below.
Winner: AG1
At the time of this writing, Athletic Greens has conducted three separate scientific studies on AG1's potential for improving gut health. Additionally, the company has collaborated with experts to publish different peer-reviewed pieces of research on its greens powder, some of which also cover AG1’s impact on gut health. Many of these studies — including those from Athletic Greens and other researchers — use an experimental model of the gut known as SHIME.68
The acronym SHIME stands for Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem. As defined by experts, it’s an in vitro (taking place outside of a living being) model researchers use to simulate “the entire gastrointestinal tract incorporating stomach, small intestine, and different colon regions.” Additionally, experts note this model is “a highly standardized system” that “leads to highly reproducible results.”69
This amount of research is impressive; it’s usually a stroke of luck to find a single study done on a branded supplement. Self-funded studies do have the potential for bias, but studies on specific products often wouldn’t happen without the company funding them. In an attempt to prevent (or at least reduce) bias, Athletic Greens notes the involvement of third-party experts and independent clinical research organizations.
Below, we’ve put together a chart offering a quick overview of the three aforementioned gut health studies and their results.
This small, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involved 30 healthy adults between the ages of 21 and 49. Participants took AG1 or a placebo for a month and researchers determined the impacts on their digestive systems by evaluating stool samples. The treated group saw about a threefold increase in healthy gut bacteria versus the placebo group.
Athletic Greens’ in-house SHIME study comparing AG1 to a control found that the greens powder increased the production of serotonin (by nearly tenfold) and short-chain fatty acids in the gut (by 44%). Interestingly, most of your body’s serotonin is actually located in the gastrointestinal tract. It can help protect your gut, alter how fast digestion moves, and control your appetite. However, nausea occurs when more serotonin is released into your gut than can be digested, which could indicate that AG1 may lead to some nausea as a side effect of higher serotonin production.70
And levels of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are often lower in cases of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), which include ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. SCFAs can help the GI system maintain homeostasis, reduce inflammation, and strengthen the gut barrier.71
Though the other two studies utilized a control, Athletic Greens’ observational study didn’t. It was a “single-arm study,” which means everyone involved in the study received the treatment (in this case, AG1) and no one was given a placebo. We prefer to see controlled studies, as they can better show whether or not something actually works, but this data is still worth a look.
In this study, 35 healthy adults between the ages of 25 and 48 self-reported how they felt over a 3-month period while taking AG1. After one month, 80% of participants reported less gas and bloating, 85% felt their bowel movements were more regular, and 97% said they had more energy. After three months, 94% of participants felt more relaxed and 97% said they had fewer cravings and noticed improvements in digestion. Of course, these results are based on people relaying their experiences, not observable data from an experiment. Due to the nature of this study, we have the least amount of faith in its results.
With all of that in mind, it becomes clear why we chose AG1 for gut health over Primal Greens. The latter does include some of the same gut-friendly ingredients, however, like probiotics, inulin, and fungal digestive enzymes, so it still has the potential to be beneficial. Here’s how those ingredients may help:
Additionally, Primal Greens’ larger Digestive Complex blend may make it better for those with sensitive stomachs. If your system isn’t used to eating a bunch of greens and other vegetables, then Primal Greens could be a better starting point. However, AG1 still ultimately wins in this category due to its scientific support.
Winner: AG1
According to the National Institutes of Health’s Office of Dietary Supplements, there are certain vitamins and minerals that are essential for proper immune function. These include:74
Between Primal Greens and AG1, the latter contains the majority of those nutrients (with the exception of vitamin D); the former is limited to vitamin C, vitamin E, and zinc only. Here’s how these two greens powders compare in the content of each, and the Percent Daily Value (%DV):
Primal Greens | AG1 | |
---|---|---|
Vitamin A | N/A | 555mcg (62%) |
Vitamin C | 110mg (122%) | 420mg (467%) |
Vitamin D | N/A | N/A |
Vitamin E | 10mg (67%) | 83mg (553%) |
Selenium | N/A | 20mcg (36%) |
Zinc | 7.5mg (68%) | 15mg (136%) |
Examining the cases where they both have entries in the chart above, AG1 has at least double the amount of each.
As a side note, the vitamin C content difference is most interesting to us since Primal Greens has ingredients with some of the highest vitamin C content — like acerola cherries, which contain 50-100 times the amount as citrus fruits.43
In the end, though, AG1’s higher immune-supporting nutrient content gives it the crown in this category, despite Primal Greens’ promising ingredients.
Winner: Draw
While some of the possible health improvements from greens powders, like better immunity, can be partially attributed to certain ingredients (such as vitamin C, citrus fruits, certain mushrooms, etc.), most of this potential comes from — as we touched on previously — eating more fruits and vegetables.14
The closer to five servings you eat per day, the lower your chances of developing various chronic health concerns,11 particularly cardiovascular ones.75 This information does support the notion that greens powders can reduce your risk of chronic disease — but, to reiterate, this is because of the fruit and vegetable content, not anything unique to greens powders themselves.
On a similar note, the ability of greens powders to potentially boost your energy is also most likely due to increased fruit and vegetable intake. Many of the fruits and veggies in Primal Greens, AG1, and other greens powders are complex carbs, which are high in fiber or starches and take longer for your body to break down.12 As explained by registered dietitian Beth Czerwony, RD, LD, “Complex carbs provide lasting energy. These are the types of foods that can get you through your day.”13
The list below contains some examples of complex carbohydrate fruits and vegetables that are high in fiber or starches. Next to each entry, we’ve added which greens powder it’s present in: AG1, Primal Greens, or both.12 13 76
A majority of these ingredients are found in both Primal Greens and AG1, meaning their potential for maintaining lasting energy is fairly similar.
Poor nutrition can also lead to low energy or fatigue,77 no matter your age or health status, so providing your body with the nutrients it’s missing may help boost your energy levels.78 79 With that in mind, both Primal Greens and AG1 have the potential to increase your energy and reduce your risk of chronic disease due to their sizeable and diverse fruit and vegetable content.
Winner: Primal Greens
Photo by Innerbody Research
To put it plainly, high-quality greens powders are often quite expensive. But, if you think of greens powders more like an assortment of fruits and vegetables and less like a typical supplement, then it’s not that surprising to learn that they can be on the pricey side. Studies have shown that,80 even as far back as the 1800s,81 healthier foods, like fruits and vegetables, are generally more expensive than those high in simple carbohydrates, sugar, and fats.82
That being said, AG1 is a fair bit more expensive than Primal Greens due to its higher quantities of nutrient-dense fruits and vegetables. Primal Greens isn’t the least expensive greens powder on the market, either, but it is more affordable than AG1.
However, subscription discounts can ease the cost burden of both products. No matter which greens powder you choose, subscribing takes around 20% off the price. And both products are covered by generous 90-day money-back guarantees. Additionally, subscribing to Primal Greens means you get free shipping, while AG1, in contrast, will always charge those in the U.S. a flat rate of $9, subscription or not.
The chart below shows the prices for each product. AG1 also comes in individual travel packets, so its prices are written as a range (and the travel packets are always the more expensive option).
Primal Greens | AG1 | |
---|---|---|
Servings per item | 30 | 30 |
One-time purchase | $49.95 | $99-$109 |
One-time purchase cost per serving | $1.67 | $3.30-$3.63 |
Subscription | $39.96 (20% off) | $79-$89 (18-20% off) |
Subscription cost per serving | $1.33 | $2.63-$2.96 |
Other subscription options? | No | “Double Subscription” (60-day supply) |
Other subscription costs | N/A | $149-$169 ($2.48-$2.82 per serving) |
Bulk purchasing available? | Yes, but only on one-time purchases; 6-18% off | No |
Bulk purchase cost per bag | $46.95 (2 bags); $43.95 (3 bags); $40.95 (4 bags) | N/A |
Shipping costs? | Free with a subscription or on orders $75+; otherwise $5.95+ | Always $9 |
Money-back guarantee | 90 days | 90 days |
Additionally, AG1 subscriptions come with free gifts with your first delivery, while Primal Greens just sends you the powder itself. AG1’s gifts include:
Gifts or not, the price of AG1 is still quite a bit higher than that of Primal Greens. The protection of the money-back guarantee could make the cost of AG1 less of a dealbreaker for some people, while others will still greatly prefer the more cost-effective appeal of Primal Greens.
But, in any case, the data in the chart above clearly shows that AG1 is roughly double or more the cost of Primal Greens in almost all cases. With this large of a price difference, plus the perk of having both bulk and subscription discounts available, choosing Primal Greens as our winner for cost was all but guaranteed.
Winner: AG1 (barely)
Generally, both Primal Greens and AG1 are convenient products. AG1 just so happened to win by a hair for a couple of reasons:
As you can see, these are some pretty small details, but they were noticeable during our testing. Let’s review each aspect of the customer experience and explain this further.
Both AG1 and Primal Greens allow you to email, call, or live message a support agent; in this way, they’re completely equal. The only tiny difference is that Primal Greens has specific business hours for its customer service, while AG1’s team is available 24/7. This all-day, every-day policy is particularly convenient for those who work long hours or live in a different time zone.
Primal Greens and AG1 are both covered by a 90-day money-back guarantee for your first purchase. There aren’t any differences between the two policies.
Both websites make it easy to purchase, and subscription management is also very straightforward for each. AG1 offers different subscription intervals that may be more convenient — 15, 30, 45, and 60 days — while Primal Greens sticks with a pretty basic one, two, or three months.
In terms of using the actual powder, AG1 mixed the easiest; it dissolved without hassle in cold water. And it’s also available in travel packets for taking on the go. Primal Greens is only available in a large pouch, and this powder was a bit more difficult to mix. It ended up creating a sort of green foam on the top of the glass that our testers needed to scoop off. It was like getting cold foam on your drink at a coffee shop, but far less pleasant to drink because of the bubbly texture.
None of Primal Greens’ inconveniences are all that bad; they shouldn’t stop you from enjoying it as a greens powder. They’re just something to keep in mind. So, while AG1 technically wins in this category, it’s not by a landslide or anything.
Winner: Primal Greens
If you don’t like the taste of a greens powder, you’re less likely to want to actually drink it. When mixed in cold water, neither Primal Greens nor AG1 were considered “pleasure drinks” by our testers, but Primal Greens definitely won out between the two. Primal Greens does taste distinctly “green,” but it also has a noticeable fruitiness that gradually becomes the main flavor the more you drink. The only bad part about drinking Primal Greens was the foam that can appear from mixing; that tasted more like watery vegetable juice and was promptly scooped off by our testers.
Insider Tip: Despite Primal Harvest's claim that its greens powder can be mixed into hot liquids, we recommend against this. Doing so will kill the probiotics and stop the digestive enzymes from working properly.9 10 Additionally, baking and cooking with greens powders should be avoided for the same reasons.
AG1, in comparison, has a strong stevia aftertaste. Primal Greens also contains stevia, but you can’t tell as much as you can with AG1. Once you get past the stevia, though, AG1 tastes vaguely like pineapple and apples (both of which are in the various blends). One tester with a particularly strong sensitivity to bitter flavors noticed a faint “onion-like” aftertaste with AG1, but none of our other testers experienced this.
Ultimately, while Primal Greens is our choice for flavor over AG1, this category is so subjective that you may love AG1 more, or even dislike them both. This is another place where the 90-day guarantee for each comes in handy — if you don’t like either, you can get your money back.
Depending on your personal reasons for wanting to try Primal Greens or AG1, there are a host of other products out there that may be just as good, or even better, for your needs.
While Athletic Greens’ AG1 is our favorite greens powder overall, in our guide to the best there could be other options that might better suit your needs. For example, though Primal Greens won for taste over AG1 in this review, it wasn't our top pick for the best-tasting unflavored greens powder in our guide — that title goes to Amazing Grass. Similarly, Primal Greens wasn’t the best budget pick in our guide, meaning there are much more cost-effective greens powders out there.
To learn more about these other options — the runner-up, best budget pick, widest variety of flavors, and more — check out our guide to the best greens powders linked below.
If you’re searching for heightened immunity — and you don’t adhere to a strict vegan or vegetarian diet — then bovine colostrum powders may be something to consider. These powders are made from the initial, immunoglobulin-rich milk produced by cows around 2-4 days after giving birth. Taking these supplements can boost gut health, immunity, skin health, and more.83 And our top pick, ARMRA, offers a product that may also be beneficial for athletes.
Multiple greens powders, including both Primal Greens and AG1, contain mushrooms and other adaptogens that may improve your body’s response to stressors.84 If the main draw of a greens powder for you is more energy and additional adaptogen content, then you might find mushroom coffee to be an interesting option, as well.
These beverages — which don’t always actually contain coffee or even caffeine — are often packed with functional mushrooms and other botanicals intended to boost your health and wellness in various ways. The flavors are fairly diverse, too, with regular coffee, matcha, and hot chocolate being only a small selection of available options.
Sources
Innerbody uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
Mishra, S., Stierman, B., Gahche, J., & Potischman, N. (2021). Dietary Supplement Use Among Adults: United States, 2017–2018. CDC.
Hee, S. L., Moore, L., Park, S., Harris, D., & Blanck, H. (2022). Adults Meeting Fruit and Vegetable Intake Recommendations — United States, 2019. CDC.
The Insight Partners. (2023). Greens Powder Market Size Report | Global Forecasts 2030. The Insight Partners.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). FDA 101: Dietary Supplements. FDA.
Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2023). Do you know what the TGA does and doesn't regulate? TGA.
NSF. (n.d.). Athletic Greens AG1. NSF Certified for Sport.
NSF. (n.d.). What Our Mark Means. NSF Certified for Sport.
National Library of Medicine. (2024). Ashwagandha. MedlinePlus.
Harvard Medical School. (2017). The benefits of probiotics bacteria. Harvard Health Publishing.
Cleveland Clinic. (2021). Enzymes. Cleveland Clinic.
Wang, D. D., Li, Y., Bhupathiraju, S. N., Rosner, B. A., Sun, Q., Giovannucci, E. L., Rimm, E. B., Manson, J. E., Willett, W. C., Stampfer, M. J., & Hu, F. B. (2021). Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Mortality: Results from Two Prospective Cohort Studies of US Men and Women and a Meta-Analysis of 26 Cohort Studies. Circulation, 143(17), 1642.
Cleveland Clinic. (2024). Carbohydrates. Cleveland Clinic.
Cleveland Clinic. (2024). Eating for Energy: Foods That Fight Fatigue. Cleveland Clinic Health Essentials.
Cleveland Clinic. (2024). Powdered Greens: Do They Really Work? Cleveland Clinic Health Essentials.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Facts About the Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP). FDA.
Lee, A. N., & Werth, V. P. (2004). Activation of Autoimmunity Following Use of Immunostimulatory Herbal Supplements. Archives of Dermatology, 140(6), 723–727.
Chakka, S., S. Concha, J. S., Bax, C. E., Zeidi, M., & Werth, V. P. (2021). The effects of immunostimulatory herbal supplements on autoimmune skin diseases. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 84(4), 1051.
National Kidney Foundation. (n.d.). Vitamins and Minerals in Chronic Kidney Disease. National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
Shane-McWhorter, L. (2023). Rhodiola. Merck Manual Professional Version.
Mount Sinai. (n.d.). Turmeric. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Food Allergy Research & Education. (n.d.). Avoiding Cross-Contact. FARE.
Mount Sinai. (n.d.). Multiple vitamin overdose. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Saljoughian, M. (2021). Hypervitaminosis: A Global Concern. U.S. Pharmacist, 2021, 46(10), 47-50.
Attinà, A., Leggeri, C., Paroni, R., Pivari, F., Cas, M. D., Mingione, A., Dri, M., Marchetti, M., & Renzo, L. D. (2021). Fasting: How to Guide. Nutrients, 13(5).
Johns Hopkins Medicine. (n.d.). Intermittent Fasting: What is it, and how does it work? The Johns Hopkins University.
NSF. (n.d.). About Us. NSF Certified for Sport.
Godman, H. (2021). How many fruits and vegetables do we really need? Harvard Health Publishing.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2005). Dietary Supplement Labeling Guide: Chapter IV. Nutrition Labeling. FDA.
Bora, K. S., & Sharma, A. (2011). Phytochemical and pharmacological potential of Medicago sativa: a review. Pharmaceutical Biology, 49(2), 211–220.
Samtiya, M., Aluko, R., & Dhewa, T. (2020). Plant food anti-nutritional factors and their reduction strategies: an overview. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition, 2, 6.
Molldrem, K. L., Li, J., Simon, P. W., & Tanumihardjo, S. A. (2004). Lutein and β-carotene from lutein-containing yellow carrots are bioavailable in humans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 80(1), 131-136.
Fu, J., Zheng, Y., Gao, Y., & Xu, W. (2022). Dietary Fiber Intake and Gut Microbiota in Human Health. Microorganisms, 10(12).
Hu, J., Wang, J., Li, Y., Xue, K., & Kan, J. (2023). Use of Dietary Fibers in Reducing the Risk of Several Cancer Types: An Umbrella Review. Nutrients, 15(11).
Nitzke, D., Czermainski, J., Rosa, C., Coghetto, C., Fernandes, S. A., & Carteri, R. B. (2024). Increasing dietary fiber intake for type 2 diabetes mellitus management: A systematic review. World Journal of Diabetes, 15(5), 1001-1010.
McRae, M. P. (2017). Dietary Fiber Is Beneficial for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 16(4), 289-299.
Mount Sinai. (n.d.). Spirulina. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2019). Seaweed, spirulina, dried. FoodData Central.
Grover, P., Bhatnagar, A., Kumari, N., Bhatt, A. N., Nishad, D. K., & Purkayastha, J. (2021). C-Phycocyanin-a novel protein from Spirulina platensis- In vivo toxicity, antioxidant and immunomodulatory studies. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(3), 1853-1859.
National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements. (2022). Choline Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. NIH.
Burgess, J. W., Neville, T. A. M., Rouillard, P., Harder, Z., Beanlands, D. S., & Sparks, D. L. (2005). Phosphatidylinositol increases HDL-C levels in humans. Journal of Lipid Research, 46(2), 350-355.
Mudgil, D., & Mudgil, S. (2024). Acacia gum: Chemistry, properties & food applications. Food and Humanity, 2, 100264.
Larson, R., Nelson, C., Korczak, R., Willis, H., Erickson, J., Wang, Q., & Slavin, J. (2021). Acacia Gum Is Well Tolerated While Increasing Satiety and Lowering Peak Blood Glucose Response in Healthy Human Subjects. Nutrients, 13(2).
Prakash, A., & Baskaran, R. (2018). Acerola, an untapped functional superfruit: A review on latest frontiers. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55(9), 3373-3384.
Shanthakumar, P., Klepacka, J., Bains, A., Chawla, P., Dhull, S. B., & Najda, A. (2022). The Current Situation of Pea Protein and Its Application in the Food Industry. Molecules, 27(16).
Mahmoud, A. M., Hernández Bautista, R. J., Sandhu, M. A., & Hussein, O. E. (2019). Beneficial Effects of Citrus Flavonoids on Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2019.
Cleveland Clinic. (2024). Oxidative Stress. Cleveland Clinic.
Inoue, Y., Cormanes, L., Yoshimura, K., Sano, A., Hori, Y., Suzuki, R., & Kanamoto, I. (2022). Effect of Apple Consumption on Postprandial Blood Glucose Levels in Normal Glucose Tolerance People versus Those with Impaired Glucose Tolerance. Foods, 11(12).
Ceriello, A. (2005). Postprandial Hyperglycemia and Diabetes Complications: Is It Time to Treat? Diabetes, 2005, 54(1), 1-7.
Koutsos, A., Tuohy, K. M., & Lovegrove, J. A. (2015). Apples and Cardiovascular Health—Is the Gut Microbiota a Core Consideration? Nutrients, 7(6), 3959-3998.
Cleveland Clinic. (2022). Does Inulin Help Improve Gut Health?. Cleveland Clinic Health Essentials.
Le Bastard, Q., Chapelet, G., Javaudin, F., Lepelletier, D., Batard, E., & Montassier, E. (2020). The effects of inulin on gut microbial composition: a systematic review of evidence from human studies. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases: Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 39(3), 403–413.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. (2020). Astragalus. NIH.
Pezzali, J. G., & Shoveller, A. K. (2024). Herbal paw-sibilities: Potential use and challenges of Astragalus membranaceus and Panax species (ginseng) in diets intended for cats and dogs. Animal Frontiers, 14(3), 17-27.
Wang, K., Zhang, H., Han, Q., Lan, J., Chen, G., Cao, G., & Yang, C. (2020). Effects of astragalus and ginseng polysaccharides on growth performance, immune function and intestinal barrier in weaned piglets challenged with lipopolysaccharide. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 104(4), 1096-1105.
Wang, X., Hu, C., Ding, L., Tang, Y., Wei, H., Jiang, C., Yan, Q., Dong, Q., & Degen, A. A. (2021). Astragalus membranaceus Alters Rumen Bacteria to Enhance Fiber Digestion, Improves Antioxidant Capacity and Immunity Indices of Small Intestinal Mucosa, and Enhances Liver Metabolites for Energy Synthesis in Tibetan Sheep. Animals: An Open Access Journal From MDPI, 11(11).
Mount Sinai. (n.d.). Bromelain. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. (2020). Bromelain. NIH.
National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements. (2023). Probiotics Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. NIH.
Mills, S., Yang, B., Smith, G. J., Stanton, C., & Ross, R. P. (2023). Efficacy of Bifidobacterium longum alone or in multi-strain probiotic formulations during early life and beyond. Gut Microbes, 15(1).
Yao, S., Zhao, Z., Wang, W., & Liu, X. (2021). Bifidobacterium Longum: Protection against Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Journal of Immunology Research, 2021.
Mount Sinai. (n.d.). Lactobacillus acidophilus. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Guo, H., Yu, L., Tian, F., Chen, W., & Zhai, Q. (2023). The Potential Therapeutic Role of Lactobacillaceae rhamnosus for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Foods, 12(4), 692.
Lin, Y., Chen, W., Cheng, C., & Shen, C. (2021). Vaginal pH Value for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Common Vaginitis. Diagnostics, 11(11), 1996.
Flach, J., van der Waal, M. B., Kardinaal, A. F. M., Schloesser, J., Ruijschop, R.M.A.J., & Claassen, E. (2018). Probiotic research priorities for the healthy adult population: A review on the health benefits of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis BB-12. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 2018, 4(1), 1452839.
Chr. Hansen. (n.d.). Our probiotic strains. Chr. Hansen A/S & Novonesis.
Wong, W., Chan, B. D., Leung, T., Chen, M., & Tai, W. C. S. (2022). Beneficial and anti-inflammatory effects of formulated prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics in normal and acute colitis mice. Journal of Functional Foods, 88, 104871.
Harahap, I. A., Moszak, M., Czlapka-Matyasik, M., Skrypnik, K., Bogdański, P., & Suliburska, J. (2024). Effects of daily probiotic supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus on calcium status, bone metabolism biomarkers, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: A controlled and randomized clinical study. Frontiers in Nutrition, 11.
Venema, K., & Van den Abbeele, P. (2013). Experimental models of the gut microbiome. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 27(1), 115-126.
Van de Wiele, T., Van den Abbeele, P., Ossieur, W., Possemiers, S., & Marzorati, M. (2015). The Impact of Food Bioactives on Health: in vitro and ex vivo models - Chapter 27: The Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME). Springer.
Cleveland Clinic. (2022). Serotonin. Cleveland Clinic.
Parada Venegas, D., K., M., Landskron, G., González, M. J., Quera, R., Dijkstra, G., Harmsen, H. J., Faber, K. N., & Hermoso, M. A. (2019). Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)-Mediated Gut Epithelial and Immune Regulation and Its Relevance for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Frontiers in Immunology, 10, 424615.
Cleveland Clinic. (2023). Probiotics. Cleveland Clinic.
Garvey, S. M., Guice, J. L., Hollins, M. D., Best, C. H., & Tinker, K. M. (2022). Fungal digestive enzymes promote macronutrient hydrolysis in the INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of digestion. Food Chemistry, 386, 132777.
National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements. (2023). Dietary Supplements for Immune Function and Infectious Diseases Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. NIH.
Wang, X., Ouyang, Y., Liu, J., Zhu, M., Zhao, G., Bao, W., & Hu, F. B. (2014). Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. The BMJ, 349.
Cleveland Clinic. (2023). 31 High-Fiber Foods You Should Be Eating. Cleveland Clinic HealthEssentials.
Harvard Medical School. (2011). Eating to boost energy. Harvard Health Publishing.
Azzolino, D., Coelho-Junior, H. J., Proietti, M., Manzini, V. M., & Cesari, M. (2022). Fatigue in older persons: the role of nutrition. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 82(1).
Francis, H. M., Stevenson, R. J., Chambers, J. R., Gupta, D., Newey, B., & Lim, C. K. (2019). A brief diet intervention can reduce symptoms of depression in young adults – A randomised controlled trial. PLOS ONE, 14(10), e0222768.
Frazão, E. (2005). Diets high in fruit and vegetables are more expensive than diets high in fats and sugars. Evidence-Based Healthcare and Public Health, 9(2), 104-107.
Drewnowski, A. (2010). The cost of US foods as related to their nutritive value. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 92(5), 1181-1188.
Rao, M., Afshin, A., Singh, G., & Mozaffarian, D. (2013). Do healthier foods and diet patterns cost more than less healthy options? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 3(12).
Playford, R. J., & Weiser, M. J. (2021). Bovine Colostrum: Its Constituents and Uses. Nutrients, 13(1), 265.
Cleveland Clinic. (2022). Adaptogens. Cleveland Clinic.